Eliseo Joseph v. Spouses Josefina Joseph and Danilo Joseph, G.R. No. 234384, April 26, 2021
FACTS:
Respondents Spouses Joseph and petitioner Eliseo Joseph entered
into an Agreement to Sell of the subject property for P225,000.00, with
petitioner making a downpayment upon the signing of the contract and the
balance shall be paid by petitioner within one year from and after the
execution of the contract.
According to petitioner, he was able to fully pay the agreed
consideration of the subject property. Petitioner filed a complaint for
specific performance against respondents praying that they be ordered to
execute a final deed of absolute sale.
Respondents claimed that in addition to the purchase price
of P225,000, the parties also agreed for petitioner to pay them an additional
amount of P30,000 before a Deed of Absolute Sale may be executed in
favor of petitioner.
The RTC ruled in favor of respondents.
The CA denied petitioner's appeal.
ISSUE:
Whether
the amendment of the contract is valid
RULING:
YES.
It bears noting that the Agreement to Sell which was entered into by the
parties, with an agreed price of P225,000 already amounted to a binding
contract between them. It is in the nature of a contract to sell, which is
defined as "a bilateral contract whereby the prospective seller, while
expressly reserving the ownership of the subject property despite delivery
thereof to the prospective buyer, binds himself to sell the said property
exclusively to the prospective buyer upon fulfillment of the condition agreed
upon, that is, full payment of the purchase price." In a contract to sell,
"ownership is retained by the seller and is not to pass until the full
payment of the price." It is "commonly entered into so as to protect
the seller against a buyer who intends to buy the property in installments by
withholding ownership over the property until the buyer effects full payment
therefor."
Considering the nature of a contract to sell, which creates a
period for the other party to comply with his/her obligation, there still
remains a room for negotiation with respect to the terms already agreed upon.
Any change in the terms of the agreement cannot however be unilaterally imposed
by a single party; the same must be mutually agreed upon by the parties. This
is consistent with the characteristic of autonomy of contracts, which allows
the parties to establish such stipulations, clauses, terms and conditions as
they may deem appropriate provided only that they are not contrary to law,
morals, good customs, public order or public policy. The standard norm in the
performance of their respective covenants in the contract, as well as in the
exercise of their rights thereunder, is expressed in the cardinal principle
that the parties in that juridical relation must act with justice, honesty and
good faith.
Maintaining the essence of a contract, which is the meeting
of the minds of the parties, agreements which may be subsequently entered into
by the parties must be consensually agreed upon. As in this case, the purchase
price originally agreed upon at P225,000 was increased to P255,000 as
stated in the Deed of Absolute Sale.
Comments
Post a Comment